Ethical Frameworks for AI-Assisted Counseling in the Digital Era
Article Sidebar
Digital Mental Health,
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into mental health and counseling services has transformed traditional counseling practices, offering increased accessibility, scalability, and efficiency in the digital era. AI-assisted counseling systems—such as chatbots, virtual counselors, and decision-support tools—are increasingly used to support psychological well-being. However, their deployment raises complex ethical concerns related to privacy, autonomy, transparency, bias, accountability, and the preservation of human-centered care.
Purpose. This study aimed to examine ethical frameworks for AI-assisted counseling in the digital era. Specifically, it analyzed key ethical principles and challenges associated with AI-mediated counseling practices and explored how these principles can be operationalized to ensure ethical integrity, client safety, and professional accountability.
Method. A qualitative, conceptual research design was employed using systematic literature analysis and ethical framework synthesis. Data were drawn from peer-reviewed journal articles, professional counseling ethics codes, AI governance guidelines, and policy documents published between 2015 and 2025. The data were analyzed through thematic coding and comparative ethical analysis to identify recurring ethical dimensions and points of convergence across frameworks.
Results. The findings indicate that ethical AI-assisted counseling requires the integration of five core principles: respect for client autonomy, data privacy and confidentiality, transparency and explainability of AI systems, fairness and bias mitigation, and shared accountability between human counselors and AI developers. The analysis also reveals gaps between existing counseling ethics codes and emerging AI-specific risks, particularly in informed consent and decision-making authority.
Conclusion. Ethical frameworks for AI-assisted counseling must evolve beyond traditional counseling ethics to address the unique challenges posed by intelligent systems. The study highlights the need for interdisciplinary ethical models that combine counseling ethics, AI governance, and human-centered design to support responsible and trustworthy AI integration in digital counseling practices.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ammah, L. N. A. (2024). AI4people ? an ethical framework for a good AI society: The Ghana (Ga) perspective. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, 22(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-06-2024-0072
Barletta, V. S. (2023). A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (Query date: 2026-02-02 13:17:58), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593478
Bedeker, A. (2022). A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research. BMJ Global Health, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096
Bhaskar, S. M. M. (2023). An Equity and Justice-Informed Ethical Framework to Guide Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research. Clinics and Practice, 13(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract13010011
Brüggen, L. (2025). AI-Based Financial Advice: An Ethical Discourse on AI-Based Financial Advice and Ethical Reflection Framework. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 44(3), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156241302279
Buckey, T. M. (2024). An Ethical Framework for Allergy and Immunology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in Practice, 12(5), 1153–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.018
Cagliero, D. (2023). A framework to identify ethical concerns with ML-guided care workflows: A case study of mortality prediction to guide advance care planning. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(5), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad022
Chauncey, S. A. (2023). A framework and exemplars for ethical and responsible use of AI Chatbot technology to support teaching and learning. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 5(Query date: 2026-02-02 13:17:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182
Cheah, C. W. (2025). AI-Augmented Netnography: Ethical and Methodological Frameworks for Responsible Digital Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24(Query date: 2026-02-02 13:17:58). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251338910
Chowdhury, T. (2023). AI ethical biases: Normative and information systems development conceptual framework. Journal of Decision Systems, 32(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2062849
Diaz-Asper, C. (2024). A Framework for Language Technologies in Behavioral Research and Clinical Applications: Ethical Challenges, Implications, and Solutions. American Psychologist, 79(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001195
Ekmekci, P. E. (2022). A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ETHICAL DECISIONMAKING DURING PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES. Acta Bioethica, 28(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2022000100105
Esmonde, K. (2023). A social and ethical framework for providing health information obtained from combining genetics and fitness tracking data. Technology in Society, 74(Query date: 2026-02-02 13:17:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102297
Ferrell, O. C. (2024). A theoretical framework to guide AI ethical decision making. Ams Review, 14(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-024-00275-9
Genovesi, S. (2022). Acknowledging Sustainability in the Framework of Ethical Certification for AI. Sustainability Switzerland, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074157
Hendriks, S. (2022a). A New Ethical Framework for Assessing the Unique Challenges of Fetal Therapy Trials. American Journal of Bioethics AJOB, 22(3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1867932
Hendriks, S. (2022b). A new ethical framework to determine acceptable risks in fetal therapy trials. Prenatal Diagnosis, 42(8), 962–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6163
Hersey, A. E. (2024). Abortion policies at the bedside: Incorporating an ethical framework in the analysis and development of abortion legislation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108412
Jha, D. (2025). A Conceptual Framework for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice. Bioengineering, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12020180
Larres, P. (2023). A Framework for Authentic Ethical Decision Making in the Face of Grand Challenges: A Lonerganian Gradation. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(2), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04974-2
Lennon, R. P. (2022). A General Framework for Exploring Ethical and Legal Issues in Sports Medicine. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 35(6), 1230–1238. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220208R1
McMahon, E. (2023). A framework for ethical research in international and comparative education. Compare, 53(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1876553
Pastor-Escuredo, D. (2022). An Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Cities. AI Switzerland, 3(4), 961–974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai3040057
Prikshat, V. (2022). A multi-stakeholder ethical framework for AI-augmented HRM. International Journal of Manpower, 43(1), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0118
Rivron, N. C. (2023). An ethical framework for human embryology with embryo models. Cell, 186(17), 3548–3557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.028
Saleh, A. M. S. (2024). A Cyclic Framework for Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Autonomous Vehicles. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150335
Saurabh, K. (2022). AI led ethical digital transformation: Framework, research and managerial implications. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, 20(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2021-0020
Swindell, A. (2024). Against Artificial Education: Towards an Ethical Framework for Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Education. Online Learning Journal, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4438
Tan, C. (2023). An ethical framework adapted for infection prevention and control. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 44(12), 2044–2049. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.121
Wang, J. (2024). A new framework for ethical artificial intelligence: Keeping HRD in the loop. Human Resource Development International, 27(3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2346492
Yarborough, B. J. H. (2023). A Stakeholder-Informed Ethical Framework to Guide Implementation of Suicide Risk Prediction Models Derived from Electronic Health Records. Archives of Suicide Research, 27(2), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2064255
Zhu, J. (2022). An ethical analysis of clinical triage protocols and decision-making frameworks: What do the principles of justice, freedom, and a disability rights approach demand of us? BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00749-0
Zlateva, P. (2024). A Conceptual Framework for Solving Ethical Issues in Generative Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 381(Query date: 2026-02-02 13:17:58), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA231182