The Stress Management Methods to Improve Student Well-Being(A Systematic Literature Review)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Improving student well-being is crucial to be researched and developed as it relates to the enhancement of students' social, emotional, and academic competencies and serves as a defense mechanism against emotional disorders experienced by students, such as depression, suicide, self-harm, antisocial behavior (bullying and violence), and substance abuse. One method to enhance student well-being is stress management, as one of the factors affecting student well-being is the level of academic stress. The aim of this study is to identify stress management methods previously employed by researchers to improve student well-being. This research utilized a systematic literature review method. The results revealed that out of 239 articles identified in the initial stage, 19 relevant articles met the criteria set by the researchers. The stress management methods identified include relaxation and meditation methods, mindfulness methods, cognitive therapy, and behavior modification methods.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abbasi, M. A. (2025). Effect of corporate social irresponsibility on organizational workplace deviant behaviour: The meditating role of moral disengagement. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2023-0070
Aleshaiwi, A. (2023). Household food waste in domestic gatherings – the negotiation between social and moral duties. British Food Journal, 125(9), 3272–3287. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2022-0166
Balle, S. N. (2022). Empathic responses and moral status for social robots: An argument in favor of robot patienthood based on K. E. Løgstrup. AI and Society, 37(2), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01211-2
Barreiro, A. (2022). Extending the Conversation on Moral Judgement Development: Relations Between Social Intuitionism, Constructivism and Cultural Psychology. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaiso, 19, 181–202. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp181-202
Cabellos, B. (2022). Do pro-social video games promote moral activity?: An analysis of user reviews of Papers, Please. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11411–11442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11072-x
?op, N. G. (2024). Exploring social media influencers’ moral dilemmas through role theory. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2241468
Dahl, A. (2022). EARLY MORAL DEVELOPMENT: Four Phases of Construction Through Social Interactions. Handbook of Moral Development Third Edition, Query date: 2025-08-03 21:14:28, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047247-12
Fantus, S. (2023). ‘Have They Talked About Us At All?’ The Moral Distress of Healthcare Social Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Investigation in the State of Texas. British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac206
Gunkel, D. J. (2022). Editorial: Should Robots Have Standing? The Moral and Legal Status of Social Robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9(Query date: 2025-08-03 21:14:28). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.946529
Hong, Y. (2022). Empathy and teachers’ fairness behavior: The mediating role of moral obligation and moderating role of social value orientation. Plos One, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268681
Mandl, S. (2023). Exploring key categories of social perception and moral responsibility of AI-based agents at work: Findings from a case study in an industrial setting. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings, Query date: 2025-08-03 21:14:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585906
Mathew, L. (2022). English Linguistic Imperialism from Below: Moral Aspiration and Social Mobility. Dalam English Linguistic Imperialism from Below Moral Aspiration and Social Mobility (hlm. 191). https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788929158
Molinaro, M. L. (2024). Family physicians’ moral distress when caring for patients experiencing social inequities: A critical narrative inquiry in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 74(738). https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0193
Mughal, Y. H. (2023). Employees’ Perceptions of Green Supply-Chain Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Sustainability in Organizations: Mediating Effect of Reflective Moral Attentiveness. Sustainability Switzerland, 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310528
Murtaza, G. (2023). Gossip 2.0: The role of social media and moral attentiveness on counterproductive work behaviour. Applied Psychology, 72(4), 1478–1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12449
Pirdelkhosh, M. (2022). Happiness and Moral Courage Among Iranian Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Workplace Social Capital. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13(Query date: 2025-08-03 21:14:28). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.844901
Sampene, A. K. (2024). Examining the nexus between social cognition, biospheric values, moral norms, corporate environmental responsibility and pro-environmental behaviour. Does environmental knowledge matter? Current Psychology, 43(7), 6549–6569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04832-6
Ukil, M. I. (2024). Feeling compassion and responsible but not starting a social venture: Role of empathy and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intention. Society and Business Review, 19(1), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2022-0227
Wang, J. (2023). Envisioning a credit society: Social credit systems and the institutionalization of moral standards in China. Media Culture and Society, 45(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221127364
Wang, L. (2023). How is emotional intelligence associated with moral disgust? The mediating role of social support and forgiveness. Current Psychology, 42(12), 10223–10233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02218-0
Yoo, H. N. (2022). Distinctions Between Moral and Conventional Judgments From Early to Middle Childhood: A Meta-Analysis of Social Domain Theory Research. Developmental Psychology, 58(5), 874–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001330